Wait, isn't the same thing? In fact, there are many studies on this case and we still haven't a concrete definition. Not joking. This means that anyone can interpret the meaning of this words any way they want. But in order to establish a joint opinion, it would be interesting if we started thinking the same way, stipulating a meaning. For that, of course, we need to have a solid foundation in our arguments. I'm not saying this classification is the best way, but , i believe it's interesting to consider. I share in parts with the interpretation of Sato and Cardoso¹, Aguiar and Battaiola², and Rouse III³. From them, i could form the idea that: Gameplay: sums up to the game itself. Explaining better, is all parts of the game (graphics, programming, music, animation, plot, etc.) interacting with each other and all parts of the game interacting with the player. The word that stands out here is the interaction (Rouse III, 2001), because without it the game si...
Comments
Post a Comment